Session Summary

Session Number:341
Session ID:S1224
Session Title:Gender Comparisons
Short Title:Gender Comparisons
Session Type:Interactive Paper
Hotel:Hyatt East
Floor:LL3
Room:Wacker West (3)
Time:Tuesday, August 10, 1999 8:30 AM - 10:10 AM

Sponsors

GDO  (Audrey Murrell)amurrell@katz.business.pitt.edu (412) 648-1651 

General People

Facilitator de Janasz, Suzanne C. James Madison U. dejanasc@jmu.edu 540-568-8779 
Facilitator Crocitto, Madeline M. State U. of New York, Old Westbury MMCrocitto@aol.com (516) 747-4869 
Facilitator Jones, Ray  U. of Pittsburgh rayjones+@pitt.edu (412) -486-9118 

Submissions

Women's Ways: The Impact of Organizational Status in the Organization on Women's Management Styles 
 Foster-Johnson, Lynn  Amos Tuck School of Business/Dartmouth College foster-johnson@dartmouth.edu (603) 646-1945 
 Davidson, Martin N. U. of Virginia mdav@virginia.edu (804)-924-4483 
 We examined the degree to which differences in women's conflict styles can be attributed to organizational structure rather than gender. Differential use of competing strategies was clearly linked to organizational status, while status differences in the use of accommodation, collaboration, avoidance, and compromise were less strong. Managers and women with more education preferred to compete in conflict encounters, using avoidance and collaboration much less as a strategy to resolve conflicts. Older women, non-managers, and women with only a high school education used accommodating and compromising strategies to resolve conflicts, rather than competition. These differences in conflict management styles that can be attributed to organizational structure contradict a gender-centered model of conflict management.
 Keywords: Women ; conflict management styles; organizaitonal status
An Exploratory Study of Leadership Style Among Women and Men in the Political Arena 
 Tucker, Mary L. Ohio U. tuckerm1@ohiou.edu (740)-593-2044 
 McCarthy, Anne M. Colorado State U. mccarthy@lamar.colostate.edu (970)-491-6876 
 Jones, Colleen  U. of Nebraska cjones@cbamail.unl.edu (402)-472-3001 
 Shiarella, Ann Harris Colorado State U. anns@lamar.colostate.edu (970)-491-6002 
 Today's volatile political arena calls for strong leadership. As technology increases information sharing, Americans are becoming more vocal in government affairs as a whole and with their legislators, in particular. Legislators are now expected to be transformational leaders who envision the future needs of constituents and are capable of negotiating, mediating, and championing these causes in an effective and credible manner. The old way of directing others is being replaced by empowering others. This paper reviews the literature on transformational leadership and how it relates to gender differences, leading to an exploratory study of the leadership styles among women and men in state legislatures as well as the relationship between leadership style and perceptions of extra effort, effectiveness, and satisfaction. According to a canonical correlation analysis, two dimensions explain the data. The first variate indicates that leaders who describe their style as transformational perceive high extra effort on the part of their followers. This finding is compatible with previous leadership research. The second variate shows that men had more positive perceptions of effectiveness and satisfaction with their leadership style than women had. This fits with research that women in male-dominated careers show less self-confidence and attribute their success to external rather than internal factors. Implications for future research include verifying the contradictory findings in this study that female transformational leaders are not satisfied with their leadership style and do they see themselves as effective.
 Keywords: transformational leadership; gender differences; canonical correlation
Examining Gender Differences in Intuitive Decision Making in the Workplace: An Exploratory Investigation 
 Burke, Lisa A. Louisiana State U. in Shreveport burkela@juno.com 318-797-5017 
 Miller, Monica  U. of Dayton monica.miller@juno.com (614) 836-3478 
 Intuitive decision making is increasingly being viewed as a viable managerial decision tool in today’s complex and competitive landscape. However, a general lack of consensus in the management literature exists as to what intuition is, along with various unfounded generalizations about who uses it (i.e., women or men). Therefore, in this paper, we present results from a recent exploratory investigation that attempted to elucidate the topic of intuition, using interviews of 51 experienced professionals. Specifically, in our effort to guide future research, we report: 1) how this sample of seasoned practitioners defined intuition, and 2) our results regarding gender differences in the use of intuitive decision making at work. In terms of the latter, we selectively highlight participant comments regarding: women’s use of intuition in work versus non-work settings, reasons women may negate intuition in workplace decision making, and insights as to why men may invoke their intuition at work. Finally, based upon the results of the present study, implications for both research and practice are discussed.
 Keywords: intuitive decision making; gender differences; women's intuition