Session Summary

Session Number:298
Session ID:S1189
Session Title:Global Alliances and Interorganizational Cooperation in International Management
Short Title:Global Alliances
Session Type:Interactive Paper
Hotel:Hyatt East
Floor:LL3
Room:Wacker West (1)
Time:Monday, August 09, 1999 9:00 AM - 10:20 AM

Sponsors

IM  (Farok Contractor)farok@andromeda.rutgers.edu (973) 353-5348 

General People


Submissions

Expanding the International Scope of the Firm: A Typology of Cooperative Strategies 
 Garcia-Canal, Esteban  U. of Oviedo egarcia@econo.uniovi.es 34 98 5103693 
 Lopez-Duarte, Cristina  U. of Oviedo clopez@econo.uniovi.es 34-985-102810 
 Rialp-Criado, Josep  U. Autònoma de Barcelona Josep.Rialp@uab.es 34 93 581 22 70 
 Valdes Llaneza, Ana  U. of Oviedo avaldes@econo.uniovi.es 34 98 5103914 
 This paper analyzes the different cooperative strategies that a firm can use in its internationalization process. Eleven longitudinal studies of cases of Spanish multinational firms were used as empirical evidence. By analyzing the specific type of capacities pursued in alliances and their international scope, we identified four cooperation strategies, discussing their advantages, inconveniences and appropriate contractual form, as well as the dynamic considerations associated with said strategies.
 Keywords: International alliances; Cooperative strategies; International strategies
Strategic Alliance and Firm Value: A Case Study of the British Airways/USAir Alliance 
 Park, Jong-Hun  City U. of Hong Kong efpark@cityu.edu.hk (852)-2788-8674 
 Zhang, Anming  City U. of Hong Kong efanming@cityu.edu.hk (852)-2788-7342 
 Park, Namgyoo K. New York U. npark@stern.nyu.edu 212-998-0412 
 We examine the stock-market reactions of partner firms and rival firms to a series of events leading to the international allaince between British Airways and USAir. Using the event-study methodology, we find that abnormal returns to rival firms are negatively affected by the probability that the alliance would be consummated, while those to partner firms are positively influenced by that probability. We find some evidence of unbalanced benefit-sharing between the partners. We also find that closer rivals are more adversely affected by the alliance than are other rivals. Our findings suggest that international alliances would strengthen partner firms, which in turn hurts their rivals through increased competition.
 Keywords: Impact on rival firms; International alliance; Degree of rivalry
Sharing International Joint Venturing Experience: An Empirical Study of Some Key Determinants 
 Tsang, Eric W. K. Nanyang Technological U. awktsang@ntu.edu.sg 65-790-5785 
 This paper proposes and tests a model of the factors affecting the sharing of international joint venturing experience in a parent company. Based on the survey responses from 73 Singapore companies with respect to their joint ventures set up in China, the results suggest that management involvement and learning effort are the two main factors affecting experience sharing. This finding lends support to the notion of learning-by-doing. These two factors are in turn mainly determined by the strategic importance fo the joint venture concerned. Another major factor affecting experience sharing is institutionalization of foreign direct investment (FDI) experience, which is influenced by a company's size and amount of FDI experience.
 Keywords: International joint ventures; Experience sharing; Organizational learning
Distinct Institutions, Different Links: Supply Relations in the UK and Dutch Agro-Food Industry 
 Rademakers, Martyn Franciscus Erasmus U., Rotterdam mrademakers@fac.fbk.eur.nl +31 10 408 2384 
 In this paper the characteristics of supply relations in the Dutch and UK agro-food industry are compared and contrasted with each other. Concepts of the recent network literature are combined into a framework for cross- national analyses with a focus on the content of inter-firm relations. In addition, characteristics of inter-firm organization are linked with the nature of three key social institutions: the government, the financial system, cultural conventions about individualistic behavior. Based on this framework, in-depth interviews were conducted at leading firms in the Dutch and UK agro-food industry. The results show that, contrary to the Dutch situation, spot-market relations are widespread in the UK. Dutch firms apply a more cooperative approach in their supply relations. These differences are explained by referring to the distinct nature of social institutions in both countries. In the UK, the role of the state in the agro-food industry shifted from ‘regulatory’ to ‘laissez faire’ while the Dutch state has been facilitating in nature. In addition, the financial system in the Netherlands is more credit-based than in the UK, while individualistic behavior is less legitimate. As a result, Dutch agro-food firms operate in a more stable environment than their counterparts in the UK. The results of this study suggest that the behavior of internationally operating firms is severely affected by nationally distinct institutional environments. As a result, it is likely that firms in different countries will display different organizational responses to similar strategic challenges.
 Keywords: inter-firm relations; social institutions; cross-national analysis