Session Summary

Session Number:771
Session ID:S620
Session Title:Natural Capital, Green Strategies, and Organizational Performance
Short Title:Green Strategies
Session Type:Division Paper
Hotel:Swiss
Floor:4
Room:Neuchatel
Time:Monday, August 09, 1999 2:30 PM - 3:50 PM

Sponsors

ONE  (John Jermier)jermier@groucho.bsn.usf.edu (813) 974-1752 

General People

Chair Starik, Mark  George Washington U. starik@gwu.edu 202-994-5621 
Discussant Orssatto, Renato J. U. of Technology, Sydney (UTS) renato.orssatto@uts.edu.au (612)-9514-3600 
Discussant Clelland, Ian  U. of Tennessee, Knoxville clelland@utkux.utcc.utk.edu  
Discussant Kennelly, James J. Skidmore College jkennell@skidmore.edu (518)-580-5108 

Submissions

Environmental Strategies and Firm Competitiveness: A Critical Review of the Evidence and New Directions 
 Christmann, Petra  Darden Business School, U. of Virginia ChristmanP@Virginia.edu (804)-924-3995 
 The effects of firms' environmental strategies on their competitiveness have been analyzed from a variety of perspectives. Predictions and empirical results of different perspectives are conflicting and inconclusive. This paper reviews five existing perspectives and their empirical evidence. Reasons for conflicting empirical findings of the perspectives are identified, ways to reconcile the contradictory findings are suggested, and suggestions for further research are developed. While the environmental economics literature suggests that environmental protection lowers competitiveness, the environmental management literature and the dynamic perspective of environmental regulation suggest that implementation of certain environmental practices can increase competitiveness. The social responsibility and the finance literature both analyze the relationship between environmental performance and competitiveness and come to inconclusive results. Reasons for the differences in the predictions and empirical results include differences in the conceptualization of the key variables across the perspectives. Environmental strategies are conceptualized as responses to environmental regulations, as choosing and implementing the right environmental practices, and as environmental performance. Competitiveness is conceptualized as cost and differentiation advantages and as financial performance, as absolute advantage or as advantage relative to competitors, and as short-term or long-term advantage. In addition, differences in the level of analysis - firm versus industry-, and the omission of several important variables in the analysis - asymmetries in firm resources and capabilities, and characteristics of environmental issues - contribute to the different results. It is suggested that the inclusion of these variables in the analysis can reconcile the conflicting findings.
 Keywords: Environmental Strategies; Firm Competitveness
Voluntary Environmental Initiatives: a Resource-Based Perspective 
 Paton, Bruce  U. of California, Santa Cruz paton@cats.ucsc.edu 408)247-8745 
 Voluntary environmental initiatives are private or public efforts to promote improvements in corporate environmental performance not required by law. Despite the growing importance of these voluntary initiatives, practice has outrun theory. Theory in both corporate environmental strategy and public policy has failed to address voluntary environmental initiatives adequately, in part, because these efforts appear to conflict with the underlying economic theory of the firm. Recent empirical evidence has identified at least three trends in corporate environmental performance that traditional theory cannot readily explain. First, many corporations have autonomously reduced environmental impacts from their operations and their products. Second, policy experiments such as the U.S. EPA's Energy STAR program have helped induce extensive, voluntary improvements in environmental performance. Finally, firms within the same industry have varied widely in their participation in voluntary initiatives. None of these trends could have occurred, if firms had been acting in accordance with conventional economic theory of the firm. Recent theory at the intersection of economics and business strategy could help explain these anomalies and reduce the gap between theory and practice. This paper describes how resource-based strategy can help explain the apparent success of voluntary environmental initiatives. Resource-based strategy's focus on firms' efforts to differentiate themselves provides an insightful framework for interpreting the choices that firms make in deciding to participate in voluntary environmental initiatives.
 Keywords: resource-based strategy,; voluntary initiatives,; Porter hypothesis
Natural Capital, Geographic Concentration, and the Emergence of Sustainable Industries 
 Russo, Michael V.  U. of Oregon mrusso@oregon.uoregon.edu (541)-346-5182 
 This paper focuses on the emergence and growth of sustainable industries, specifically analyzing the rise of the wind energy industry in California. Based on a favorable institutional environment and the presence of abundant natural capital, the wind energy industry took root and flourished in California during the last two decades. This paper analyzes this phenomenon by hypothesizing the determinants of where and when wind energy projects would be founded. The results suggest that the presence of multiple, mutually-supportive economic, social, and natural influences generated greater numbers of wind energy projects. The paper concludes by discussing implications for the rise of other sustainable industries and for research in organizations and the natural environment.
 Keywords: Environment; Entrepreneurship; Renewable Energy