Session Summary

Session Number:817
Session ID:S403
Session Title:Perspectives on Corporate Political Strategy
Short Title:Corp. Political Strategy
Session Type:Division Paper
Hotel:Swiss
Floor:LL3
Room:Gball 2
Time:Monday, August 09, 1999 12:20 PM - 2:10 PM

Sponsors

SIM  (Dawn Elm)drelm@stthomas.edu (612) 962-4265 

General People

Chair Mahon, John F. Boston U. jmahon@bu.edu 617-353-4152 
Discussant Griffin, Jennifer J. George Washington U. jgriffin@gwis2.circ.gwu.edu 202/994-2536 
Discussant Shaffer, Brian  U. of Maryland brian_shaffer@rhsmith.umd.edu 301/405-2196 

Submissions

Corporate Political Management Readiness: The Relationship of Environment-Organization and Performance 
 Moussetis, Robert C. North Central College romousse@noctrl.edu (630)-637-5475 
 Abu-Rahma, Ali  United States International University aburahma@usiu.edu (619)-635-4571 
 Nakos, George  Clayton College and State U. georgenakos@mail.clayton.edu 770 961 3507 
 Kriemadis, Athanassios  U. of Thessaly Kriemadis@uth.gr 011-301-678-3500 
 This paper presents a preliminary empirical investigation of corporate political management readiness. The aspiration of the results is to establish a foundation that would enable corporate management to navigate effectively through environmental shifts and to provide an optimal political response capability that maximizes economic profitability. It establishes a preliminary instrument that facilitates the political posturing of the firm by suggesting what type of managerial political behavior and capability will be appropriate at different levels of environmental turbulence.
 Keywords: Strategy; Political; Management
The Allocation of Resources by Interest Groups and Firms: Lobbying, Litigation, and Administrative Regulation 
 de Figueiredo, John M. Massachusetts Institute of Technology jdefig@mit.edu 617-258-7253 
 de Figueiredo, Rui J. U. of California, Berkeley rui@haas.berkeley.edu 510-642-6452 
 There are many ways a firm can change its nonmarket environment. Lobbying politicians, engaging regulators, and litigating policy outcomes are three of the main mechanisms available to firms. In this theoretical paper, we examine how lobbying, regulation, and litigation are intimately linked. We build a two stage model. In this first stage, firms lobby a legislator for a particular outcome. If the outcome is unfavorable, the firm can then choose to litigate the issue before a court. We demonstrate in the paper that firms will save money in lobbying so that they can undertake an aggressive litigation effort, should they lose in the lobbying phase of nonmarket competition. Moreover, the mere threat of litigation by an opposing interest group can have profound effects on the lobbying behavior of companies.
 Keywords: litigation; lobbying; corporate nonmarket activity
An Option Theory Approach to MNC Mode-of-Entry Decisions 
 Reed, Kira Kristal U. of Connecticut kkreed@snet.net (860)-486-2390 
 Previous research on multinational corporations' (MNCs) expansion behavior has developed along four lines of inquiry. These lines can be summarily described as the why, how (i.e., acquisition, joint venture, export/license agreement), where (into which countries), and when of expansion. Research on MNC expansion behavior has not studied these lines comprehensively in one study. It is the premise of this paper that MNCs do not make such expansion decisions independently. Furthermore, to truly encompass the global context in which these decisions are made, MNCs' relationships with host countries must be incorporated to better understand MNC expansion patterns within regions, rather than into individual countries. Using option theory and portions of the international political economics literature, this paper presents a theoretical model with testable propositions which predict MNC mode-of-entry choice.
 Keywords: Options; International; Expansion
Corporate Strategy for Political Access: A Multivariate Approach 
 Schuler, Douglas A. Rice U. schuler@rice.edu 713-285-5472 
 Rehbein, Kathleen A. Marquette U. rehbein@vms.csd.mu.edu (414) 288-1446 
 Cramer, Roxy  Rice U. roxyc@stat.rice.edu (713) 527-8101 
 This study tests a model of corporate political action, the politically constrained profit maximizing model in order to look at how firms implement a political access strategy. In this analysis, we define a political access strategy as consisting of three political tactics, campaign contributions, use of in house lobbyists, and contracting outside lobbyists which are often used to establish a relationship with policymakers. Using a relatively new quantitative approach, an alternating logistic regression, we examined which U.S. manufacturing firms are most likely to implement a comprehensive political strategies. Our findings indicate that: (1) the largest manufacturing firms with defense contracts are more likely to expend resources to gain access to key policymakers and (2) firms in politically active industries and in industries with congressional ties will use multiple tactics to establish relationships with congresional members.
 Keywords: Political; Corporate; Tactics