Session Summary

Session Number:688
Session ID:S358
Session Title:Views of Oneself and the Organization
Short Title:Global work attitudes
Session Type:Division Paper
Hotel:Hyatt West
Floor:LL2
Room:Regency Ball B(S)
Time:Wednesday, August 11, 1999 8:30 AM - 10:20 AM

Sponsors

OB  (Robert Liden)bobliden@uic.edu (312) 996-4481 

General People

Discussant James, Keith  Colorado State U. kjames@lamar.colostate.edu (970) 491-6821 
Chair Brown, Kenneth  U. of Iowa kenneth-g-brown@uiowa.edu 319/335-3812 

Submissions

Objective and subjective work characteristics and well-being: Contemporaneous, panel, and replicative tests 
 Shaw, Jason D. Drexel U. shawj@post.drexel.edu 215-895-2142 
 Gupta, Nina  U. of Arkansas, Fayetteville ngupta@comp.uark.edu (501)-575-6233 
 Relationships between objective and subjective work characteristics (job control, work monotony, and exposure to danger) and employee well-being were examined in a longitudinal study of 651 employees of five midwestern organizations. Cross-sectional path analysis results in two time periods revealed that the effects of objective work characteristics on well-being were completely mediated by perceptions of work characteristics, although little support was found for this model longitudinally. Theoretical and methodological extensions and the implications of the study for future research are addressed.
 Keywords: Well-being; Job characteristics
Engaging the Human Spirit at Work: Exploring the Psychological Conditions of Meaningfulness, Safety, and Availability  
 May, Douglas R. U. of Nebraska dmay1@unl.edu 402-472-8885 
 Gilson, Richard L. U. of Nebraska rgilson@unlgrad1.unl.edu (402)-472-3077 
 Harter, Lynn  U. of Nebraska lharter@unlgrad1.unl.edu (402)-472-3348 
  Building on Kahn's (1990) ethnographic study of engagement, a field study of employees in a large midwestern insurance company explored the determinants and mediating effects of three psychological conditions on employees' engagement in their work --- meaningfulness, safety, and availability. Engagement is first differentiated from conceptualizations of related constructs and the theoretical grounding for the determinants of each psychological condition is developed. Results from path analyses of the theoretical framework revealed that the psychological conditions of experienced meaningfulness and safety exhibited significant relations with employees' engagement at work and generally mediated the effects of their determinants. Specifically, job enrichment, work role fit, and feelings of competence were related to psychological meaningfulness. Supportive supervisor relations, self-consciousness, and organizational fit influenced perceptions of psychological safety. Psychological availability was related to resources, feelings of competence, organizational fit, and outside activities, but availability did not significantly influence engagement. Implications for theory building on engagement and management practice are discussed.
 Keywords: Engagement; Psychological Conditions; Meaningfulness
Be specific! The role of context in core evaluations of the world and the self 
 Chen, Gilad  George Mason U. gchen2@gmu.edu (703)-993-3706 (x3) 
 Goddard, Thomas G. American Accreditation HealthCare Comission/URAC goddardt@erols.com 202-216-9010 
 Casper, Wendy J. Personnel Decision Research Institutes and George Mason U wcasper@pdi-corp.com 703-812-3047 
 This study extends core evaluations theory (Judge, Locke, & Durham, 1997) by examining distinctions among various higher-order general and specific core evaluations of the self and the world. Particularly, we distinguish among general self-evaluations (composed of general self-efficacy and global self-esteem), work-specific self-evaluations (composed of job self-efficacy and organization-based self-esteem), and work-related control beliefs (composed of work and organization locus of control). Additionally, we propose a model of relationships among the core evaluations constructs and an expended job attitudes criterion (composed of global job satisfaction, affective organization commitment, and job involvement). LISREL analyses conducted on survey responses from 158 healthcare employees demonstrated the distinctions among the higher-order constructs of general self-evaluations, work-related control beliefs, work-specific self-evaluations, and job attitudes, as well as between their respective first-order components. Furthermore, work-specific self-evaluations partially mediated the relationships of general self-evaluations and work-related control beliefs with job attitudes. Finally, work-related control beliefs moderated the relationship of general self-evaluations with work-specific self-evaluations; specifically, the relationship of general self-evaluations with work-specific self-evaluations became more positive as levels of work-related control beliefs increased. Contributions to core evaluations theory and to organizational practice and suggestions for future research are discussed.
 Keywords: Core evaluations; Job attitudes; Motivation
Organizational Cynicism: An Examination Using Social Exchange Theory and Contemporary Workplace Outcomes 
 Brandes, Pamela  Southern Connecticut State University brandes@scsu.ctstateu.edu 203-392-6139 
 Dharwadkar, Ravi  Syracuse U. rdharwad@syr.edu 315-443-3386 
 Dean, James W. U. of North Carolina, Chapel Hill jamesdean@unc.edu 919-962-0798 
 Recent conceptual work in organizational behavior has highlighted the importance of organizational cynicism in the workplace. However, few studies have empirically examined: (1) the underlying attitudinal nature of organizational cynicism, (2) the importance of social exchange perceptions in influencing the attitudinal components of cynicism, and (3) the resulting impact of organizational cynicism on contemporary work behaviors. In this article, we investigate the underlying attitudinal nature of organizational cynicism and then develop theoretical arguments highlighting the importance of social exchange processes in understanding organizational cynicism and some potential effects of organizational cynicism on work behaviors. We then test this theoretical framework based on data collected from a field study of 264 employees and a sub-sample of 129 supervisor-subordinate dyads in a manufacturing organization. The data suggest that organizational cynicism and personality-based cynicism are two distinct constructs. In addition, trust in an organization’s senior management influences affective, cognitive, and behavioral dimensions of cynicism while perceived organizational support influences cynical beliefs. Finally, the three components of cynicism have differential effects on work outcomes. Based on the above, we argue that cynicism makes a unique contribution to our understanding of workplace attitudes and behaviors and suggest directions for future research within this domain.
 Keywords: social exchange; organizational cynicism; organizational behavior
Sanctioning Systems, Decision Frames, and Cooperation 
 Tenbrunsel, Ann E. U. of Notre Dame tenbrunsel.1@nd.edu (219)-631-7402 
 Messick, David  Northwestern U. dwmessick@nwu.edu 847-491-3470 
 This paper examines the influence of surveillance and sanctioning systems on cooperative behavior in dilemma situations. The first study provides evidence that a weak sanctioning system can actually result in less cooperation than no sanctioning system at all and suggests that one reason for this effect is that sanctions affect the type of decision that individuals perceive that they are making, prompting a concentration on the business versus ethical aspects of the decision. Based on this finding, a theoretical model is then presented that postulates that the relationship between sanctions and cooperation is due to both a signaling effect, in which sanctions influence the type of decision that is made, and a processing effect, in which the decision processing that occurs, including whether or not the strength of the sanction is considered, is dependent on the decision frame that has been evoked. A second study provides support for the processing effect hypothesis. Theoretical and managerial impilcations of these findings are discussed.
 Keywords: Dilemmas; Sanctions; Decision Frames