Session Summary

Session Number:290
Session ID:S155
Session Title:The Family in the Grey Flannel Suit: Balancing Work and Family
Short Title:Balancing Work and Family
Session Type:Shared Interest Track Paper
Hotel:Hyatt East
Floor:LL2
Room:Columbus E/F
Time:Tuesday, August 10, 1999 2:00 PM - 3:20 PM

Sponsors

CAR  (Jay Mahoney)Mahoneyj@saturn.montclair.edu (973) 655-7476 
HR  (Lynn Shore)mgtlms@langate.gsu.edu (404) 651-3038 
OB  (Robert Liden)bobliden@uic.edu (312) 996-4481 
PNS  (Mary Tschirhart)mtschirh@indiana.edu (812) 855-4944 

General People

Facilitator Kolb, Deborah M. Simmons GSM dkolb@vmsvax.simmons.edu 617-521-3871 

Submissions

Enriching or Depleting? A Theoretical Model and Empirical Test of Engagement in Work and Family 
 Rothbard, Nancy P. Northwestern U. rothbard@nwu.edu 847-467-3503 
 Current organizational and societal trends have heightened interest in engagement in multiple roles such as work and family. The work-family discourse has framed the issue in terms of conflict and depletion. While acknowledging that perspective, this study challenges the assumption that engagement in one role is inherently depleting to engagement in another role, and suggests that multiple roles may enrich one another. The model of engagement in work and family builds on and integrates the depletion and enrichment arguments by identifying the type of emotional response to a role as a critical contrasting assumption held by the two perspectives. Rather than assuming that engagement is depleting, this study tests how people experience engagement in multiple roles. The findings indicate that while depletion does exist, stronger evidence exists for enrichment. Strong gender differences were also found. Depletion existed only for women and only in the work to family direction. In contrast, enrichment existed for both men and women in both the work to family and the family to work directions. Overall, many more linkages between work and family were found for women than for men.
 Keywords: Work and Family; Role Engagement; Emotion
Expanding the Dominant Model of Career Satisfaction: Effects of Work-Family Conflict 
 Martins, Luis L. U. of Connecticut martins@sba.uconn.edu (860) 486-6417 
 Eddleston, Kimberly-Ann  U. of Connecticut KEDDLESTON@aol.com (860) 486-6423 
 Veiga, John F. U. of Connecticut veiga@uconnvm.uconn.edu (860)-486-3734 
 Kidder, Deborah L. U. of Connecticut deb@sba.uconn.edu (860) 486-6418 
 Pay, promotions, and power have generally been argued to be the primary sources of career satisfaction for those pursuing corporate careers. This dominant model has prevailed in spite of the recently accepted view that spillover between work and family can have a dramatic impact on career satisfaction. In this study of 795 managers from over 100 corporations, we sought to contemporize the dominant model of career satisfaction by taking into account the role of work-family conflict. Our findings indicate that work-family conflict added significantly to the dominant model in explaining variance in career satisfaction, lending empirical support to recent theorizing on career satisfaction. In addition, moderated analysis indicated that the effects of work-family conflict on career satisfaction were stronger for women managers, and for older managers in general. Subsequent analyses revealed that among male managers, work-family conflict negatively affected career satisfaction in latter career, whereas among women, work-family conflict had a significant negative effect on career satisfaction irrespective of age.
 Keywords: Career satisfaction; Work-family conflict; Gender
Perceived Impacts of Family Leave Policies: Do Organizational Factors Matter? 
 Kim, Soonhee  Grand Valley State U. KIMS@GVSU.EDU (616) 774-3430 
 A pressing public management concern as we move into the 21st century is the ability of employees to balance their work and family needs and commitment. Despite some recent studies that point towards the importance of organizational culture and management support for family leave policies, significant gaps remain in our understanding of the contextual and organizational factors that contribute to the success or failure of such policies in public organizations. What are the characteristics of organizations that successfully implement a family leave policy? How do organizational factors affect the impacts of family leave policies on employees? Conducting a case study, the study propose several organizational factors as target research dimensions for the implementation of family leave policies in New York state government. The study found that work units' support of employees' family responsibilities, supervisors' understanding of employees' family concerns, increased workload, personnel administrators' commitment to family leave policies, and teamwork management are significantly associated with employees' perceived impacts of family leave policies on work satisfaction, organizational commitment, reduced work stress, family integrity, and productivity. The major implication of these findings is that executive leaders and organizational leaders should be aware of the relationship between organizational factors and the objectives of family leave policies. Family leave policies offer a new phase of quality of work life and human resources management in public organizations. Strong executive leadership around quality of work life and supportive organizational culture for employees' family concerns should be emphasized as essential elements of obtaining the objectives of family leave policies in public organizations.
 Keywords: organizational factors; family leave policy; leadership
Examining the Impact of Family-Friendly Benefits: The Role of Organizational Support Perceptions 
 Allen, Tammy D. U. of South Florida tallen@luna.cas.usf.edu 813-974-0484 
 Although many companies have implemented family-friendly benefit programs, often the environment of the organization does not change along with these efforts to promote a more family-friendly climate. Under these circumstances, family-friendly benefits may not have their intended effect. To test this supposition, employee global perceptions of the extent that their organization supports efforts to balance work and nonwork was examined as a moderator of the relationship between the number of family-friendly benefits offered by the organization and four dependent variables, work-family conflict, job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and turnover intentions. Survey data were gathered from 522 participants employed in a variety of occupations and organizations. After controlling for employee gender, age, race, family responsibility, marital status, education, organizational tenure, and salary, the results indicated that perceptions of organizational support for work/nonwork balance contributed a significant amount of variance associated with each of the dependent variables above and beyond the variance contributed by the control variables and the number of family-friendly benefits offered; however, no moderation effects were found. The results did suggest that perceptions of organizational support for work/nonwork balance may mediate the relationship between number of family-friendly benefits offered and the dependent variables. The results underscore the important role that the work environment can play in determining employee reactions to family-friendly benefit policies.
 Keywords: family-friendly benefits; organizational support; work-family conflict